The court has cited what it calls unique qualities that distinguish the Federal Reserve from other agencies and leave it ...

During oral arguments, the conservative justices made clear that they intend to allow Trump to fire FTC commissioner Rebecca ...

The Supreme Court's undertaking is oriented toward originalism. This often overlaps with Republican partisan outcomes – it ...

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case with huge implications for presidential power and the future of independent ...

As the oral arguments made clear, the Supreme Court is about to bless an unholy union between presidential corruption and ...

In practice, that has meant more expert, technocratic leadership. It has meant more corporate regulation than Republicans ...

The Supreme Court will weigh Trump's authority to fire a sitting FTC member in a major test of presidential powers — and a ...

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years ...

Updated on Dec. 8 at 5:05 p.m. The Supreme Court on Monday morning signaled that it was likely to strike down a federal law ...

New presidents cannot come into office and fire existing officials just to install preferred leaders in their place. But that is exactly what Trump did.

The Supreme Court will now decide whether the people we elect to govern us get to do so — or whether appointed commissioners ...

In oral arguments Monday, the Supreme Court considered a case that could expand the president's authority over independent ...