NATO Ukraine Weapons Deal

Order byBest matchMost fresh

Ukraine, Trump

Trump's NATO deal to arm Ukraine wins over GOP skeptics

President Donald Trump’s plan to assist the war effort comes with a twist because Washington won’t pay for the weapons sent to Kyiv.

· 2d

Trump announces new weapons deal for Ukraine

· 2d · on MSN

New US weapons deal for Ukraine: What will Kyiv receive and who will pay for it

· 1d

Trump's 50-Day Ultimatum Gives Russia a Chance to Wear Down Ukraine

President Donald Trump’s ultimatum to Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine within 50 days or face bruising sanctions on its energy exports has given the Kremlin extra time to pursue its summer of...

· 2d

Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not

· 4h

Russia says Trump's new weapons pledge a signal for Ukraine to abandon peace efforts

· 1d

Ukraine Celebrates Trump's Weapons Reversal, but the 'Devil's in the Details'

The plan, which Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte hatched in recent days, according to two sources familiar with the discussions, has been received positively by Ukraine and its allies.

· 23h

Two dead and many injured in Russian strike on Ukrainian shopping centre

· 8h

Ukrainian military leaders stress it would be ‘nearly impossible’ to fight Russia without drones

2don MSN

Trump sending weapons to Ukraine, threatens 'severe tariffs' against Russia if ceasefire deal not reached in 50 days

Russia launched four missiles and 136 drones into Ukraine overnight into Monday morning, according to Ukraine's air force.

EconoTimes20h

Trump’s NATO Plan Boosts Ukraine Aid with Patriot Missiles

President Donald Trump has unveiled a new strategy to support Ukraine by encouraging NATO allies to donate military equipment, particularly Patriot missile systems, in exchange for U.S. replacements.

IJR1d

Trump’s Ukraine Pivot May Be Only Way To Get Putin To The Table

President Donald Trump has long worked to bring peace to Ukraine, but his recent major policy adjustments in response to